Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-organized with a usable XAML example and input schema, but it lacks a sequenced setup workflow with validation and is missing the concrete CLI commands needed to actually scaffold and build the project.
Suggestions
Add the concrete setup commands (`dotnet new avalonia.app`, MVVM/template install, build/publish invocations) to raise actionability toward 5.
Convert the Capabilities list into a numbered, sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. build each platform, verify the app launches) to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Trim the redundant opening sentence that restates the description and repeats 'cross-platform' to push conciseness to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the opening line restates the description almost verbatim and repeats 'cross-platform' three times — minor padding that keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete input schema, project tree, and an executable MainWindow.axaml snippet, but omits the core setup commands (e.g. `dotnet new avalonia.app`) and build/publish commands, leaving key execution details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Capabilities list is an unordered bullet set, not a sequenced workflow, and there are no validation or verification checkpoints for the multi-step project-setup process. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is cleanly organized into well-labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |