CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

avalonia-ui-setup

Set up Avalonia UI project with cross-platform XAML for Windows, macOS, and Linux

52

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/avalonia-ui-setup/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise and well-structured with a usable XAML example and input schema, but it stops short of executable scaffolding commands and lacks a sequenced, validated setup workflow. Progressive disclosure is strong for a self-contained skill.

Suggestions

Add the concrete scaffolding command(s), e.g. `dotnet new avalonia.xplat -o MyAvaloniaApp`, to make project creation executable.

Replace the flat capability list with a numbered setup sequence (scaffold → configure MVVM → theme → build → publish) with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., `dotnet build` succeeds before publishing).

Trim the redundant intro sentence that restates the frontmatter description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and organized into focused sections with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the intro line slightly restates the description, a minor trim, so anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

A copy-pasteable MainWindow.axaml snippet, an input schema, and a project tree provide concrete guidance, but the core "Create Avalonia project structure" capability lacks the actual `dotnet new` scaffolding command, leaving key executable details missing (anchor 3).

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A multi-step setup (scaffold, configure MVVM, themes, native menu, build, publish) is presented as a flat bullet list with no ordered sequence and no validation checkpoints; anchor 2 (steps poorly defined, validation absent).

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

At roughly 50 lines with well-organized sections (Capabilities, Input Schema, Project Structure, MainWindow.axaml, Related Skills) and no need for external references (no bundle files present), the simple-skill exception yields anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies the Avalonia UI domain and target platforms with good natural trigger terms, but it lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and enumerates only a single concrete action. It is distinct yet could be more complete and specific.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when scaffolding a new cross-platform .NET desktop app with Avalonia UI."

Enumerate 2-3 concrete actions (e.g., "scaffold project, configure MVVM, set up Fluent/Simple themes") to raise specificity.

Add natural synonyms such as "desktop app" or ".NET desktop" to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Set up Avalonia UI project with cross-platform XAML for Windows, macOS, and Linux" names the domain and one concrete action (project setup) with platform specifics, but offers no further enumerated actions; below anchor 4 (several specific actions) yet above anchor 2 (generic/minimal).

3 / 5

Completeness

A clear "what" is present (set up an Avalonia UI project) but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance; per guideline, a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Avalonia UI", "cross-platform XAML", and "Windows, macOS, and Linux" are natural terms a user would say, giving good keyword coverage; a few natural synonyms ("desktop app", ".NET") are missing, so not anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Avalonia UI" carves a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, but the related `wpf-xaml-style-generator` skill implies minor overlap with closely related XAML skills, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
trackdubllc/Babel-Player-Alpha
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.