Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with an excellent progressive-disclosure design and a clear six-step workflow. The main cost is redundancy — friction, plateau, and sample-size guidance each appear multiple times, and the script's gate-precedence rules are stated twice in different forms.
Suggestions
Consolidate the friction/slippage guidance that currently appears in both Workflow step 4 ("Execution friction") and "Punish the Strategy" into a single section, keeping the concrete multipliers in one place.
Merge the sample-size thresholds scattered across step 4 ("Sample size"), "Common Failure Patterns" (#4), and "Critical Reminders" ("Statistical significance") into one canonical statement.
Replace the dense prose paragraph describing the script's gate precedence and `too_good` logic with a short pointer to the "Output" JSON-fields section, which already documents `decision`, `blocking_reasons`, and gate order.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and domain-dense, but visibly redundant: execution friction appears in Workflow step 4 and again under "Punish the Strategy", plateau-seeking is stated twice, sample-size thresholds repeat across step 4, "Common Failure Patterns", and "Critical Reminders", and the dense paragraph on script gate precedence duplicates the "Output" section's JSON field list. Could be tightened without losing guidance value. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: a copy-paste-ready CLI invocation with complete arguments, exact parameter-sweep multipliers ("stop loss at 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150% of baseline"), and concrete thresholds throughout (30/100/200 trades, 1.5-2x slippage, 5-year minimum test period). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with an explicit early gate ("If you can't articulate the edge clearly, don't proceed to testing"), an iterate-on-failure loop ("If fundamentally broken, iterate on hypothesis"), warning signs, and a three-outcome decision checklist. Falls short of 5 because mid-workflow validation is implicit — no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint between stress testing and out-of-sample evaluation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with well-signaled, one-level-deep references: both `references/methodology.md` and `references/failed_tests.md` exist as real files and are introduced with "When to read" and "Contents" bullets; bulk detail is correctly deferred to them and the evaluation script usage is inline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |