Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and largely actionable, with concrete commands and parameter tables. Weaknesses center on a batch workflow lacking explicit validation checkpoints, time-sensitive regulatory dates inline, and a requirements.txt reference to a file not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the workflow (e.g., verify the planner exit status and confirm the generated JSON contains expected sections before presenting orders to the user) — batch order generation currently has no verification step.
Move the FINRA intraday-rule details with their 2026-06-04/2027-10-20 dates into references/minervini_entry_rules.md or a dedicated section, keeping only a one-line pointer in Step 3, to avoid time-sensitive content aging in SKILL.md.
Fix the 'Install requirements.txt' instruction: either include the file in the bundle or replace the instruction with the actual dependencies, and fold the --as-of / exchange-calendar details into the Prerequisites section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (tables for the gate and CLI parameters, terse sections), but embeds time-sensitive regulatory dates ("effective 2026-06-04, with broker phase-in allowed through 2027-10-20") outside any old-patterns/deprecated section and duplicates gate criteria already in the reference file — content that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready bash command with all flags, a complete CLI parameter table with defaults, and named output files. Minor gaps: the "Install requirements.txt" instruction references a file absent from the bundle, and the input path uses a placeholder the user must fill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–3 are clearly sequenced, but this is a batch operation (processing the entire screener output into order templates) with no explicit validation or verification checkpoint (no exit-status check, output verification, or rejected-candidate review before presenting). Per the rubric cap, batch operations without validation cannot score above 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a real, one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference ("references/minervini_entry_rules.md — Entry methodology and rules") and appropriately bundled scripts. Minor gaps: the gate table duplicates reference-file content and prerequisite details (requirements.txt, --as-of semantics) are tucked into a trailing 'Exchange Calendar and Replay' section rather than Prerequisites. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |