Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow and clean progressive disclosure to real reference files; its main weakness is verbosity in the precedence and guardrail prose.
Suggestions
Tighten the Precedence summary and guardrail #3 by replacing run-on sentences with short bullets, removing repeated restatements of the fail-closed philosophy.
Move the lengthy non-finite-scan rationale out of guardrail #3 into the referenced decision table or a short note, keeping the guardrail to its one-line invariant.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Substantive and free of basic-concept filler, but the precedence prose and guardrail #3 use long run-on sentences and repeat the fail-closed rationale, so it could be noticeably tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable CLI invocation with concrete flags and paths plus an exact YAML output contract and a status-to-next-step table -- copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced three-step workflow with pervasive explicit validation (fail-closed on every input, defensive invariant check, documented exit codes) and error-recovery guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references to real bundle files (gate-decision-table.md, the two scripts), appropriately externalizing the large decision table. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |