Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and workflow-safe: executable commands against real bundled scripts, explicit validation checkpoints, and error-recovery guidance. The main weakness is token efficiency — extensive repetition and an inlined report template that duplicates the assets file keep progressive disclosure and conciseness below their potential.
Suggestions
Replace the ~100-line inlined report template in Step 6 with a pointer to assets/earnings_report_template.md (the file already exists), keeping only a brief structural outline inline.
Consolidate the API key guidance repeated across Prerequisites, Step 3, and Security Notes into a single section, and state the market-cap tiers ($2B/$10B/$200B) only once.
Cut Step 5's manual processing sub-steps (5.1-5.6), since generate_report.py already handles parsing, grouping, sorting, and summary statistics — a one-line note that the script does this suffices.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~700-line body is noticeably verbose: API key setup and security guidance is repeated across Prerequisites, Step 3, and Security Notes; the market-cap tier definitions (Mega >$200B / Large $10B-$200B / Mid $2B-$10B) are restated at least four times; and a ~100-line report template is inlined wholesale. Explanations like 'Earnings calendars are time-sensitive' and 'Why This Matters' pad text Claude does not need. Fits anchor 2 (several padded sections); not anchor 3, where padding would be incidental rather than structural repetition. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready against real bundled scripts ('python scripts/fetch_earnings_fmp.py 2025-11-03 2025-11-09', 'python scripts/generate_report.py earnings_data.json earnings_calendar_2025-11-02.md'), with a combined one-liner, expected JSON output schema, concrete error handling per HTTP status (401/429/empty/connection), a manual fallback mode, and four worked use cases. Matches anchor 5's fully-executable, common-cases-covered bar. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with a dedicated QA checklist step (Step 7: data quality, completeness, and format checks) and feedback loops — Step 4 maps each error to a recovery action ('401 Unauthorized: Invalid API key → Verify key or re-enter') and a Troubleshooting section covers five failure modes. Matches anchor 5 (clear sequence, explicit validation, error-recovery loops, checklists). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bundle structure is real and well-signaled (references/fmp_api_guide.md, both scripts, and the asset template all exist, one level deep), but the body inlines content that already lives in those files — most notably the full ~100-line report template duplicating assets/earnings_report_template.md, plus a detailed API guide summary and JSON schema. Fits anchor 3 ('content that should be separate is inline') more than anchor 4, where such duplication would be only a minor gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |