Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-structured with real bundle references, but the multi-step workflow omits an explicit validation checkpoint for its batch dedup/promotion operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step to the workflow, e.g., after running the script, verify edge_concepts.yaml against references/concept_schema.md before promoting concepts.
Inline-link the schema reference from the Output section (e.g., "See references/concept_schema.md for the full structure") so the reference is signaled at the point of need, not only in the trailing Resources list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with well-organized sections and executable commands; it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Quick Commands provide fully executable, copy-paste-ready invocations whose flags (--tickets-dir, --promote-hints, --max-synthetic-ratio, --overlap-threshold, --no-dedup) all match the script's argparse, with distinct usage variants. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five workflow steps are clearly sequenced, but the batch dedup and promotion steps lack an explicit validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., checking the output against concept_schema.md), so per the scoring note workflow clarity is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a dedicated Resources section pointing to real one-level-deep references (references/concept_schema.md and scripts/synthesize_edge_concepts.py), providing easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |