Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built skill body: fully executable script invocations that match the real bundle, a clearly sequenced workflow with a user-confirmation checkpoint, and appropriate one-level-deep externalization of the 142+ code reference. The main improvement opportunities are trimming the recipe tables' redundant per-filter explanations and adding a brief error-recovery note for invalid filter codes.
Suggestions
Compress the recipe sections: drop the per-filter 'Purpose' tables (each filter's meaning is already in the concept-mapping table or the external reference) and keep just the filter string, view, and the refinement tip.
Add one line to Step 4 covering the script's validation failure path (e.g., what the error output looks like and to re-check codes against references/finviz_screener_filters.md), which would close the workflow-clarity gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with FinViz-specific knowledge (filter codes, NL mappings) Claude does not already know, and it never explains generic concepts, but the 6 recipe tables restate per-filter purposes already implied by the mapping table and could be trimmed — matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready and verified against the actual script — 'python3 scripts/open_finviz_screener.py --filters "..." --view overview' plus theme-only and combined variants — with every argument documented (matching the script's argparse) and the {from}to{to} range syntax explicitly demonstrated; this matches the fully-executable top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow (load reference → interpret → present filters → execute → report) is clearly sequenced with an explicit user-confirmation checkpoint in Step 3, but there is no guidance for recovering from a rejected/invalid filter code (the script's validation failure path), which keeps it at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' instead of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure follows the anchor-4 pattern of 'a few key examples inline, bulk in separate file': the ~50-row common mapping table lives inline as the quick reference while the full 1988-line filter list is correctly externalized one level deep in references/finviz_screener_filters.md, and the script is in scripts/; both referenced files exist. Not 5 because the inline 50-row table is substantial enough that it sits on the boundary of content that could itself be externalized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |