Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and genuinely actionable: an executable command, a defined state machine, score-to-exposure tables, and well-signaled one-level references with explicit load conditions. Its main weakness is redundancy — the market-top-detector comparison and trigger lists are repeated, inflating token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Collapse the three statements of the market-top-detector complementarity (Purpose bullets, comparison table, description echo) into a single, tighter comparison — the table alone carries the information.
Trim the English trigger list that duplicates the frontmatter description, or keep the Japanese list only if Japanese-language triggering is a real requirement, noting why.
Add brief failure-path guidance (e.g., what to do if the FMP API call fails or returns insufficient history) to round out the workflow's checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The FTD/top-detector complementarity point is made three times ("Complementary to Market Top Detector" bullets, the full "Difference from Market Top Detector" table, and the closing parenthetical in the description), and the When-to-Use trigger list largely restates the description in both English and Japanese. Mostly efficient, but these duplications could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable command ("python3 skills/ftd-detector/scripts/ftd_detector.py --api-key $FMP_API_KEY"), concrete prerequisites (FMP key, Python 3.9+, requests), named output files, and threshold-based guidance ("If FTD Confirmed (score 60+)"). Minor gaps: no sample output snippet and no guidance on handling API or script failures. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-phase workflow (execute script → present results → contextual guidance) is clearly sequenced with specific per-state guidance branches and defined states. Not a destructive or batch operation so no validation cap applies, but error-recovery checkpoints (e.g., what to do if the API call fails) are absent, keeping it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both referenced files (references/ftd_methodology.md and references/post_ftd_guide.md) exist in the bundle, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled with per-file content summaries plus a "When to Load References" section giving explicit loading conditions (first use, post-FTD questions, regular execution). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |