Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable, single-purpose skill whose documented CLI flags, endpoint, and auth variable all check out against the bundled script, with explicit exit-code semantics and acceptance criteria. Remaining gaps are small: no sample output shape, and no stated recovery path when the fetch fails.
Suggestions
Add a brief example of the events[] output shape (key fields like release identifier, timestamp, market_tier) so 'Review events[]' has a concrete referent.
State the recovery action when the fetch exits nonzero (e.g., retry once, then treat the plan as unverified and pause entries) to close the feedback loop explicitly.
Mention the --limit flag alongside --currency and --min-tier since the bundled script supports it and callers may need more than the default 50 rows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every sentence carries operational information (command, exit-code semantics, acceptance criteria, auth), matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready command ("python3 skills/fxmacrodata-calendar/scripts/fetch_calendar.py --currency usd --min-tier 1" — flags verified against the actual script) plus concrete acceptance criteria (currency match, data_quality confirmation, announcement timestamp, non-empty release identifier). Minor gaps keep it below fully-executable anchor 5: no sample output shape for events[], the --limit flag is undocumented, and no example authenticated invocation is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Treat a nonzero exit as an unverified event-risk state, never as an empty calendar" plus explicit acceptance conditions) and follow-up scheduling. It falls short of anchor 5 because no recovery action is stated when the command fails — the validate-to-retry loop is implied (pause entries) rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized Workflow and Authentication sections and no external reference files needed; the single script reference resolves to a real bundle file. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |