Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable skill body: executable commands, a sequenced workflow with validation, and well-signaled one-level-deep references. The only drag is mild verbosity from the bilingual trigger list and a thrice-repeated no-API-key note.
Suggestions
State "No API key required" once (e.g. in Prerequisites) and drop the repetitions in the Purpose and Data Sources sections.
Consider folding the Japanese trigger phrases into the methodology reference or a single bilingual line rather than a full duplicate block, since the English triggers already cover activation.
Move the "Difference from Breadth Chart Analyst" comparison table into the methodology reference unless disambiguation is needed on every invocation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and commands, but the Japanese trigger block and "No API key required" repeated three times (description, prerequisites, data sources) add length that could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable bash command with real GitHub Pages URLs, the actual script path, and concrete arguments — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced phases with a data-freshness validation checkpoint and an explicit retry loop for the output-dir failure case, giving a real feedback path. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is a concise overview with a single one-level-deep reference (references/breadth_analysis_methodology.md, verified present) and a "When to Load References" section signaling when it is needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |