Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient procedural content (data-collection steps, CLI flags, component tables), but the bilingual English/Japanese 'When to Use' trigger list and the separately repeated 'API Requirements' section duplicate information already in the frontmatter and Prerequisites. Not a 3 because those additions don't earn their tokens; not a 1 because it does not explain concepts Claude already knows and is largely task-relevant.

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready bash invocation with concrete flags, valid input ranges (e.g. 'Valid range: 20-100', '0.30-1.50'), exact search queries, and direct fallback URLs. Not a 2 because the guidance is fully executable rather than pseudocode or abstract description.

Workflow Clarity

A clear three-phase sequence (Data Collection -> Execute Script -> Present Results) with explicit validation in the form of input valid-ranges and a 3-business-day freshness requirement plus output freshness warnings. Not a 2 because validation checkpoints are explicit; the operation is read-only analysis (non-destructive, single run), so the missing retry loop does not trigger the destructive/batch cap.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that points to three real, one-level-deep reference files (market_top_methodology.md, distribution_day_guide.md, historical_tops.md), each described with a 'When to Load References' navigation guide. Not a 2 because references are clearly signaled and shallow rather than nested or inline-buried.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('Detects market top probability', 'Generates a 0-100 composite score with risk zone classification') and names the three methodologies (O'Neil, Minervini, Monty), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor. Not a 2 because it goes beyond naming a domain and a few actions to enumerate distinct capabilities with a quantified output.

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (detects market top probability, generates 0-100 score) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when user asks about...' clause. Not a 2 because the trigger guidance is explicit rather than implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasing such as 'market top risk, distribution days, defensive rotation, leadership breakdown, or whether to reduce equity exposure' — terms a user would actually say. Not a 2 because it covers several common variations rather than a single keyword.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (2-8 week tactical timing for 10-20% corrections) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not a 2 because the timeframe and methodology scoping separate it from generic market-analysis skills.