Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable workflow with explicit fail-closed validation checkpoints and appropriately delegated one-level-deep references. It is concise for its density, with only minor tightening and inline-example opportunities.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic concept explanations Claude already knows; the statistical-rationale and residual-risk paragraphs earn their tokens, though the guardrails section is dense and could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, runnable CLI invocation with real flags and documents output JSON/Markdown schemas and fields; the only minor gap is the events-JSON shape being delegated to the reference template rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence with explicit fail-closed validation checkpoints — 'refuses fail-closed with a specific reason', 'never raises an exception... exits 0 with a documented reason', and the INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE guardrails — giving strong feedback loops for a data-validation-heavy skill. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-structured overview that signals one-level-deep references to real bundle files (news-failure-patterns.md, price-source-map.md) and scripts, with a 'When to Load References' section guiding navigation; methodology detail is appropriately split out rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |