Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with executable commands, a clear three-step workflow, and well-signaled references to real bundle files. Minor tightening and an explicit retry loop would lift it further.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in Step 3 for the REVIEW_REQUIRED path (e.g., 'fix the flagged inputs, re-run the gate, and only proceed on GO').
Trim the Rules and Outputs sections by moving edge-case detail into the existing references file to reduce the main-body token footprint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized and assumes Claude's competence, with concrete examples and minimal padding; a few sections like Rules and Outputs could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready CLI invocations with all flags, a concrete JSON answers example, and a clear decision table covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-3 are clearly sequenced with explicit interpretation checkpoints (REVIEW_REQUIRED review-before-order, exit code semantics), though a single explicit fix-and-retry loop would push it to 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with a Resources section clearly signaling real one-level-deep references (discipline_gate_framework.md, the CLI script); bulk rule detail sits appropriately in the main file with framework notes delegated. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |