Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built operational skill: fully executable commands verified against the actual CLI, a clear five-step workflow with meaningful data-quality guardrails, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. Remaining gaps are minor — unreferenced asset templates, hardcoded example dates, and no explicit output-verification step after batch operations.
Suggestions
Reference the bundled assets/cohort_summary_template.md and assets/daily_report_template.md in the Resources or Output Format section so all bundle files are discoverable from SKILL.md.
Replace hardcoded example dates ('--as-of 2026-06-28', '--from 2020-01-01 --to 2026-06-28') with relative or placeholder date guidance so examples do not age.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after the batch scan/backfill steps (e.g. inspect event counts and CURRENT_UNIVERSE_BACKFILL_SURVIVORSHIP_BIAS flags in the generated report before proceeding to enrich/summarize).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — mostly executable commands with brief, substantive context lines and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because example commands hardcode time-sensitive dates (e.g. '--as-of 2026-06-28', '--from 2020-01-01 --to 2026-06-28') outside any deprecated/old-patterns section, and the 'Shared FMP client' section includes implementation details (key masking, retry counts) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | All five subcommands (scan, enrich, update-outcomes, summarize, backfill) are given as complete, copy-paste-ready invocations, and every flag shown (e.g. '--fmp-universe', '--prices-json', '--survivorship-complete', '--horizons', '--group-by') exists in the bundled run_20pct_study.py CLI. Offline and FMP modes plus expected outputs are both covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with command-level detail and several checkpoints: best-effort enrichment degradation to 'NO_CLEAR_NEWS', the conditional '--survivorship-complete' guardrail, '--min-sample 10', and the requirement of 'out-of-sample validation before changing trade rules'. Not 5 because there is no explicit verify-output/re-run loop after the batch scan and backfill steps (e.g. checking event counts or flagged records before proceeding). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A Resources section clearly signals one-level-deep references that map exactly to real bundle files (all five references/*.md plus scripts/run_20pct_study.py and scripts/fmp_client.py), with inline purpose descriptions. Not 5 because the bundled assets/cohort_summary_template.md and assets/daily_report_template.md are not referenced or navigated from SKILL.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |