Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste commands and well-organized references, but the batch workflow lacks explicit validation/verification checkpoints, and there is minor cross-section redundancy. Tightening repetition and adding a verify-output step would lift it further.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the workflow (e.g., 'Confirm the timestamped report files exist and check API call count before presenting results; if the script errored, rerun with a smaller universe or check FMP_API_KEY').
Dedupe the reference list — keep it in the 'Resources' section only, or reference it once in Step 2 rather than restating all three files in both places.
Consider moving the Advanced Tuning parameter table into references/ (e.g. scoring_system.md or a tuning reference) to keep the main body a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but has minor redundancy — references appear in both 'Step 2' and the 'Resources' section, and output filenames are described in both the historical section and the 'Output' section — so it sits just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully copy-paste-ready bash commands cover the common cases (default, custom universe, full S&P 500, strict mode, historical single-ticker, advanced tuning) and parameter tables give defaults/ranges, matching the top anchor for executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with a Prerequisites section is present, but this is a batch/screening operation and there is no explicit validation or verify-then-retry checkpoint (e.g., confirm reports generated / handle API failures before presenting), which the rubric caps at 3 for batch ops lacking validation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (vcp_methodology.md, scoring_system.md, fmp_api_endpoints.md — all verified real files) and a Resources section, though the large inline parameter/tuning tables could arguably live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |