Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable command catalog with copy-paste examples and a sensible see-then-act workflow, organized into clear sections. It loses points only on minor conciseness trims and the absence of explicit post-action validation and external reference splitting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Commands are listed as terse one-line bullets with executable examples and almost no concept explanation, but a few soft touches (e.g. 'Tip: run via polter peekaboo', the 'most reliable flow' label) could be trimmed, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the perfectly-lean anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Examples are fully executable, copy-paste ready commands with real flags and arguments covering the common cases (see/click/type, capture, window/menu management, input), directly matching the 'fully executable; specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'See -> click -> type' flow shows a clear sequence and embeds a verification checkpoint via 'see --annotate' to identify targets before acting, but there are no explicit validate/verify-after steps, so it sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps' rather than the explicit-feedback-loop anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-labeled sections (Features, Quickstart, Common parameters, Examples, Notes) and is self-contained with no nested references, but at ~165 lines the command catalog could plausibly live in a separate reference file, fitting 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than the cleanly-split anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |