Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured operational guide with a clear workflow, explicit verification checkpoints, and error-recovery feedback loops. Deductions are minor: key action patterns (run_steps payloads, a run_script example) stay schematic, and the referenced bundle files are not present in this installation despite the body's otherwise excellent load-on-demand structure.
Suggestions
Inline one complete, executable `run_steps` example with realistic tool/args pairs (and a minimal `run_script` snippet) so the two most central action patterns are copy-paste ready without opening WORKFLOW.md.
Ship the referenced files (WORKFLOW.md, RUNTIME.md, BROWSER.md, RECORDING.md, EMBEDDING.md) alongside SKILL.md, or make the body state explicitly which references are optional vs. required so agents on a file-filtered install know when to fall back to `get_guide`.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries non-obvious operational specifics ("a targeted read… returns about 2K chars where a full snapshot is about 42K", token format '"s0000002a:11", not "11"') with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — a clean anchor-5 fit, not 4 because there is nothing to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool calls like `get_window_state({pid, window_id, query:"Save"})` and CLI commands (`cua-driver --version`, `status`, `doctor`) are near copy-paste, but `run_steps({steps:[{tool,args},...]})` and `run_script({script})` remain schematic with examples deferred to WORKFLOW.md — minor gaps that fit anchor 4 rather than the fully-executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered "Efficient loop" sequences observation → action → verification with explicit checkpoints ("Verify at checkpoints (after a meaningful state change, before finishing), not after every action") and the Failure map supplies feedback loops ("Read `hint` and make `next_call`"); batch operations via `run_steps` do carry validation (`observe:{}`), so the destructive/batch cap does not apply — anchor 5, not 4, because recovery loops are explicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is exemplary — one-level-deep references, each annotated ("WORKFLOW.md: route selection, exact targets, observation…") under "Load on demand; do not reabsorb these into this file", with a `get_guide({topic})` MCP fallback — but scored against the actual bundle, all eight referenced .md files (WORKFLOW.md, RUNTIME.md, MACOS.md, WINDOWS.md, LINUX.md, BROWSER.md, RECORDING.md, EMBEDDING.md) are absent, so navigation dead-ends here (better signaled than anchor 3, but the missing bundle is more than the "minor organization gaps" of anchor 5). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |