Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, actionable orchestrator skill body with explicit workflows, validation checkpoints, and a feedback loop. The only notable gaps are mild repetition of the git-commit discipline and an unlinked bundle script.
Suggestions
Consolidate the git-commit guidance into one authoritative section and reference it from the others to remove repetition.
Add a short 'Bundle' note pointing to scripts/progress.py (the implementation behind the ags.py research-pipeline subcommands) so the provided script is discoverable from the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-dense and mostly lean, assuming Claude's competence, but git-commit discipline is repeated across 'Git Checkpoint Discipline', the rules list, and 'Hard Constraints', which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands ('$PYTHON_PATH .agentsociety/bin/ags.py research-pipeline ...') with a purpose table and concrete bash snippets covering the common stage-transition and reroute cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step pipeline is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (commit after every update-stage, run 'experiment-config check' before run-experiment) and a reroute feedback loop for the destructive invalidate-downstream operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file overview with clear sections, a dot graph, and tables; however the provided scripts/progress.py bundle is not explicitly linked or signaled from the body, leaving a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |