Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable test-design skill with copy-paste templates, a sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure via a single one-level reference. Its only weakness is prose verbosity in the Red-Green Discipline section.
Suggestions
Tighten the Red-Green Discipline section from two long prose paragraphs into concise bullet points, keeping the tautological-test and horizontal-slicing insights without the discursive rationale.
The Testing Trophy ASCII diagram plus Dodds quote largely restates a well-known prioritization model; consider compressing it to the priority order and the single confidence quote to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most sections are dense tables and checklists that assume competence, but the Red-Green Discipline section is two long prose paragraphs explaining reasoning that could be tightened into bullets, fitting the "mostly efficient but could be tightened" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready strategy templates for pure functions, API endpoints, and UI components, a concrete output-format template, and specific when-to-use guidance (e.g. property-based tests for "parsers, serialization roundtrip, sorting"). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with explicit validation gates ("If you can't answer these... Fix that first"; the final "Confidence Question" feedback loop) and checklists for boundaries and test evaluation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Summary desiderata table inline with one well-signaled one-level reference ("See references/desiderata.md"), verified to exist and free of nested references; per-property detail is appropriately split into the reference file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |