Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-dense process skill: the loop is explicitly sequenced with validation and stop conditions, and bundle files are used appropriately. The main improvement areas are tightening a few over-compressed sentences, making journal/recording formats concrete, and promoting the parenthetical trace-export reference to a clearly signaled link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific policy and contains no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but a few over-packed sentences ('Keep synthetic regressions separate from the frozen first-draft denominator; additions to the corpus form a versioned cohort') and inline version-sensitive details ('Node 22.13 or later') could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The tools table gives copy-paste-ready commands and setup names concrete values ('$ARCHIFY_TUNING_HOME', 'ARCHIFY_CHROME'), but several loop steps stay at policy level (e.g. what a journal entry should contain is never specified), leaving minor gaps for an instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step Loop is clearly sequenced with explicit validation ('Investigate each changed pass/fail result... Unexplained failures remain open'), feedback loops (repairs, re-verification, 'When to stop an experiment'), and preservation rules for failed attempts and the last verified artifact. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three real, one-level-deep references (experiment-design.md, trace-signals.md, trace-export.md) are each signaled with their purpose, and the scripts/ folder is surfaced via a command table; minor gaps remain, such as trace-export.md being referenced only parenthetically and the ../../../CONTRIBUTING.md link pointing outside the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |