Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured instruction skill with an explicit workflow, validation proofs, and clean reference routing. Its main weakness is bundle integrity: three of the referenced rule files that anchor the required reading are missing, so the navigation the body promises partially fails.
Suggestions
Add the missing ./rules/creation-flow.md, ./rules/typing.md, and ./rules/capabilities.md files (or correct their paths) so the Required Reads and Workflow step 1 are executable as written.
Add an explicit feedback loop after the step-7 proofs (e.g., "if a proof fails, fix and re-run before proceeding to step 8") to reach top workflow-clarity marks.
Inline one minimal definePlugin/toReactPlugin code sketch so the semantic-layer decision rules are actionable without first opening the reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence throughout: no concept explanations, no library tutorials, and terse declarative rules like "Colocation is the default" and "Prove the smallest honest surface". Every token instructs, matching the 5 anchor rather than the 4 anchor, which still expects minor over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, runnable guidance is present — exact commands ("pnpm --filter platejs build", "node tooling/scripts/check-plate-feature.mjs <plan>"), exact paths, and named APIs ("definePlugin", "toReactPlugin") — but the mechanics of authoring are deferred to reference files and no inline code examples are given. This sits between the 4 anchor (mostly executable, minor gaps) and the 5 anchor (copy-paste ready coverage of common cases), landing at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (step 7 lists typecheck, behavior tests, and a build with its failure rationale "TS4094 errors the typecheck skips") plus a step-8 audit checklist. It stops short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit fix-and-re-validate feedback loop; it is above the 3 anchor since checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Signaling is excellent ("Read this reference when…", one-level-deep references such as package-host.md and feature/manifest.md), but scored against the actual bundle: the required reads ./rules/creation-flow.md, ./rules/typing.md, and ./rules/capabilities.md do not exist, and ../verify/references/testing.md points outside the skill. Broken required-read navigation exceeds the 4 anchor's "minor organization gaps" while the clear structure and surfaced references keep it above the cluttered/buried pattern of lower anchors. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |