CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

review-sweep

Mine review comments for broader diff-wide fixes instead of handling each line in isolation

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/review-sweep/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, well-structured, and provides a clear, actionable workflow with explicit verification. It would benefit only marginally from a concrete worked example of an inferred rule.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: rules, target lists, and an 8-step workflow with no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

The workflow gives concrete, executable steps (classify, write the inferred rule, search the diff, split into clear/maybe/does-not-apply, apply the clear set) with only minor gaps, though no illustrative concrete example of an inferred rule is shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit verify step ("Verify the changed seam directly") and a triage decision checkpoint for the maybe-set, missing only a formal validate-and-retry feedback loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

For an under-50-line single-purpose skill with no bundle files, the well-organized sections (Goal, Core Rules, Good/Bad Sweep Targets, Workflow, Output Rule) satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, specific purpose but omits an explicit trigger/"Use when" clause, which limits its discoverability and completeness. Trigger-term coverage is adequate rather than comprehensive.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases (e.g. 'Use when handling PR review feedback or repeated review comments on a branch').

Broaden trigger terms with synonyms users actually say, such as 'review feedback', 'follow-up comments', and 'PR review'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Mine review comments for broader diff-wide fixes instead of handling each line in isolation" names the domain (review feedback) and two concrete actions (mining for broader fixes, applying across the diff rather than per-line), with only minor gaps in coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clearly stated, but there is no explicit "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces "review comments", "diff-wide fixes", and "line in isolation", but lacks common natural phrasings a user would say (e.g. "PR review", "review feedback", "follow-up comments"), so keyword coverage is partial rather than comprehensive.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The focus on diff-wide review-comment pattern mining is a fairly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against general code-review skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
udecode/plate
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.