Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction skill with a concrete workflow and explicit good/bad target taxonomies. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop for the batch diff-wide application, which holds workflow_clarity at 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and sectioned (Goal, Core Rules, Good/Bad Sweep Targets, Workflow, Output Rule) with no padding and no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; tight rules like "Keep the blast radius proportional to confidence" earn their place. It matches the score-3 lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: an 8-step workflow and explicit good/bad target categories (input validation, index/key guards, redundant casts, brittle setup, etc.). The scoring note permits no code for instruction skills when guidance is actionable, so this reaches score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced with decision gates (steps 4-6) and a verification step (step 7, "Verify the changed seam directly"), but for a batch/diff-wide operation it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (what to do if verification fails). It does not fully meet the score-3 feedback-loop anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no external file references and is organized into clear, well-separated sections; per the scoring note, a skill with no need for external references can score 3 on well-organized sections alone. It is not a monolithic wall of text and nothing should be split out. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |