Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: lean, concrete, and well-sequenced, with actionable thresholds and a calibrated confidence protocol rather than vague review platitudes. The only meaningful gap is the absence of an explicit output/reporting format for findings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — no concept explanations Claude already knows, no padding; every line (e.g., "the cost gap between shortcuts and complete solutions is 10-100x smaller") adds non-obvious guidance, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete and executable: hard thresholds (">8 files or >2 new abstractions", "80% of items at P0"), specific actions ("quote the item, ask which goal it serves"), and numeric confidence bands (0.80+, 0.60-0.79, below 0.50) — per the rubric's scoring notes, absence of code is not penalized when the guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step numbered protocol with explicit sequencing ("always first") plus a confidence-calibration checkpoint and a suppression rule fits anchor 4; it falls short of 5 only because there is no explicit output/reporting format for findings. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references — per the rubric guideline, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5, and the section structure (analysis protocol, confidence calibration, exclusions) is clean and easy to navigate with no bundle files to place. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |