Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, expert-only mini-skill: excellently concise with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit no-regression feedback loop. The main gap is actionability, which stays at 2 because concrete executable commands (the benchmark invocation, metric, and packet format) are named but not shown.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example of the benchmark command and the primary-metric/checks packet format so the guidance is copy-paste ready rather than named-but-not-shown.
Optionally show a one-line example of a kept vs checks_failed packet so the no-regression routing is unambiguous in practice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout; no padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section (Contract, No-Regression Rule, Stop Rules, Handoff) earns its tokens with actionable, expert-level guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete direction (named commands slate-ar-status / slate-ar-perf / slate-plan / slate-patch, explicit target-priority ranking, stop thresholds) but provides no executable benchmark command, metric definition, or packet schema; guidance is instructive but not copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step flow is clearly sequenced (load status → pick target → run perf with no-regression checks → stop rules) with an explicit correctness feedback loop that routes regressions to checks_failed/slate-patch and requires an oracle before optimizing. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-file skill (~50 lines) with well-organized sections and no external bundle files to navigate; under the simple-skill rule this is appropriately self-contained with clear section structure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |