Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable, well-structured, and assumes Claude's competence, with concrete commands and validation checkpoints throughout. It sits just below top marks because the two default contracts are long and inlined rather than split into referenced files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes domain competence without explaining basics, but the two full default contracts (Pagination, Huge Document Select-All) run long and could be trimmed, fitting the 4 anchor rather than the lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste commands (pnpm bench:targets:list, bench-targets.mjs autoresearch-init) and METRIC line examples cover common cases, but the underlying benchmark scripts are referenced rather than shown, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Default Path sequences setup through validation (dry-run, pnpm bench:targets:check before AR init) and the Exactness Gate supplies keep/discard feedback loops, but the multi-mode structure is not a single fully-validated linear workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is well-sectioned with clear headers, but at over 200 lines with two complete default contracts inlined, some content could be split into reference files, matching the 4 rather than 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |