Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and provides an actionable output template, but lacks explicit validation/verification steps in its (read-only) workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief validation step, e.g., confirm the active plan file exists and is parseable before rendering status, to tighten the workflow.
Specify the fallback behavior when the phase/pass table or checklist is missing from the plan so output is deterministic.
Clarify the 'most relevant recent docs/plans/*.md' selection rule (e.g., by mtime) to remove ambiguity in file selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it lists what to extract, icon mappings, and a compact output template with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-ready output template and explicit status-icon mappings, but the file-selection logic (ambiguous -> list and ask) is guidance rather than executable code, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is implied but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and the cap applies only weakly since this is a read-only display task rather than a destructive or batch operation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, well-organized single-purpose skill under 50 lines with clear sections and no need for external bundle files, qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |