Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with explicit sequencing, validation loops, and concrete templates, and is well-organized into clear sections. Its main weakness is conciseness: it re-explains familiar concepts and duplicates the extension-hook instructions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance, but it re-explains concepts Claude already knows (e.g. how to make a 2-4 word short name, detailed table-formatting tips like 'spaces around content') and repeats the extension-hook block almost verbatim in Pre-Execution and step 9, so it could be tightened past the level-2 anchor toward the lean level-3 example. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable steps with specific file paths, commands (mkdir -p, copy templates), JSON payloads, and a fully worked checklist template, matching the level-3 'Fully executable... copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The nine-step flow is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints and a feedback loop (step 7c re-runs validation up to 3 iterations, caps [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers, and only proceeds when passing), matching the level-3 anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single-command workflow with well-organized sections (Pre-Execution, Outline, Quick Guidelines); per the scoring notes a simple skill with clear sections and no external references needed can score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |