Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body that is lean and easy to navigate. The main gap is the absence of a concrete example tool-call and an explicit retry/validation feedback loop for the query step.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example showing the arguments passed to resolve-library-id and query-docs (e.g., a sample query string and the returned ID format) to make the guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Add a brief validation/recovery note for the query step, such as what to do when query-docs returns no useful snippets (e.g., rephrase the concept, try a broader library ID, or fall back to web search).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and operational throughout — no explanation of what libraries or documentation are, every line instructs, and the sections each earn their tokens; it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance with exact tool names (resolve-library-id, query-docs), input/output semantics, selection criteria, scoping rules, and a fallback path, but it lacks a literal example tool-call invocation that would make it fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence (resolve → query → answer) with an explicit conditional fallback and selection checkpoint, but there is no explicit validation or error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do if query-docs returns nothing useful). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and no bundle files present; the well-organized sections (When to use / Workflow / Constraints) provide clear navigation, qualifying for the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |