Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete MCP tool calls and parameters, organized as a clear four-step sequence in a self-contained file. Its main weakness is redundancy — the 'When to Use' and 'Guidelines' sections duplicate the description and earlier steps — and the absence of any fallback guidance when a lookup fails or returns no good match.
Suggestions
Cut the duplicated guidance: the 'Guidelines' section repeats the version rule from Step 2 and the multi-concept split from Step 3 nearly verbatim — merge these into their steps and drop the section, or reduce it to only the 'prefer official sources' rule that appears nowhere else.
Add a fallback step for failed lookups, e.g. 'If no match is close or the docs don't answer the query, say so and answer from training data while noting the docs may be outdated'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean but contains real redundancy: the 'When to Use This Skill' section repeats the frontmatter description almost verbatim, and the 'Guidelines' section re-states Step 2's version guidance and Step 3's multi-concept split rule ('Split multi-topic questions into separate query-docs calls — resolve the library ID once, then query per concept'). This is more than the 'minor instances' of anchor 4 — the duplicated guidance could be cut. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable MCP guidance: named tools with parameter specs (resolve-library-id with libraryName/query, query-docs with libraryId/query), an example library ID (/vercel/next.js), and explicit selection criteria. Minor gaps keep it from anchor 5: no full call examples and no fallback when resolution returns no good match. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (resolve library ID, select best match, fetch docs, use docs) with selection criteria acting as a soft checkpoint in Step 2. No feedback loop for failed or insufficient lookups, but this is not a destructive or batch operation, so the workflow-clarity cap does not apply — anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained and single-purpose with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and no external file references in the body — none are needed. Content is well-organized into clear sections (When to Use, How to Fetch Documentation with numbered steps, Guidelines), matching the rubric's simple-skill exception for a well-organized, self-contained skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |