CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

influence-psychology

Apply the six principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", or "commitment and consistency". Also trigger when designing testimonial sections, crafting urgency messaging, or improving trust signals on landing pages. For deal negotiation tactics, see negotiation. For viral word-of-mouth, see contagious.

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable framework with exemplary progressive disclosure — every reference file exists and is one level deep. Its main weakness is token efficiency: it re-teaches Cialdini's well-known principles and includes an author biography and affiliate-linked reading list that add cost without adding capability-relevant information.

Suggestions

Trim the per-principle 'Core concept' and 'Why it works' paragraphs to a single line each (or fold into the reference files) — Claude already knows Cialdini's principles; keep only the application tables, copy patterns, and ethical boundaries that it does not.

Remove or drastically shorten the 'About the Author' section and the affiliate-tagged 'Further Reading' links; replace with a one-line attribution (e.g., 'Based on Cialdini's Influence, Expanded Ed.') since they consume context without improving task execution.

Add a brief numbered review workflow at the top (1. Identify principles in use via Quick Diagnostic, 2. Score 0-10, 3. List improvements to reach 10/10, 4. Verify against ethics checklist) to make the audit process explicit rather than implied.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The per-principle "Core concept" and "Why it works" paragraphs (e.g., "People feel obligated to give back to others who have given to them first") re-explain Cialdini's principles, which Claude already knows, and the "About the Author" biography plus affiliate-linked "Further Reading" section are padding. Not a 2 because the application tables, copy patterns, and checklists are dense, curated content where nearly every token earns its place; not a 4 because the known-concept re-explanation spans all seven principle sections.

3 / 5

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully actionable: copy-paste-ready copy patterns ("Here's a gift for you...", "Only 3 spots left at this price"), concrete product-application tables with real examples (Spotify, Dropbox, Grammarly), a defined 0-10 scoring procedure ("Always provide the current score and specific improvements needed to reach 10/10"), and a worked SaaS landing-page example combining principles. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Quick Diagnostic table (Question / If No / Action) and the Ethical Application Checklist ("Before deploying influence tactics") provide sequence-like checkpoints with feedback paths, and the onboarding sequence under Commitment is stepwise. Not a 5 because there is no explicit end-to-end workflow ordering the pieces (e.g., audit -> score -> improve -> validate) — the review process must be assembled implicitly from the Scoring, Diagnostic, and Checklist sections.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Verified against the actual bundle: all 10 inline references ("See: [references/reciprocity.md]...") point to real files, each ~250-290 lines, exactly one level deep with no nested references, plus a consolidated "Reference Files" index with per-file descriptions. The SKILL.md keeps overview-level application tables inline and pushes deeper material (gift strategies, copy templates, case studies) to the references — a clear, well-signaled structure matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capability statement, explicit multi-part trigger guidance in third person, and proactive disambiguation against neighboring skills. One accuracy note: the description says "six principles" and omits Unity, while the body teaches seven principles, so the description slightly under-represents the skill's scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates the six principles by name ("reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity") and concrete application targets ("product design, copy, and sales", "testimonial sections", "urgency messaging", "trust signals on landing pages"). This is comprehensive, specific coverage of the skill's capabilities rather than vague domain naming, matching the 5 anchor; the 4 anchor ('minor gaps in coverage') fits less well since both principles and contexts are enumerated.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ("Apply the six principles of ethical persuasion... to product design, copy, and sales") and when ("Use when the user mentions..."; "Also trigger when designing testimonial sections..."), mirroring the 5-anchor example structure with concrete trigger phrases. It clearly exceeds the 4 anchor, where the 'when' would be less explicit.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Seven natural quoted phrases ("social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment and consistency") plus behavioral triggers give good keyword coverage a user would plausibly say. Not a 5 because common variations like "Cialdini", "influence principles", "persuasion techniques", or "conversion optimization" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The persuasion-psychology niche is distinct and the description actively reduces conflict risk by redirecting adjacent topics ("For deal negotiation tactics, see negotiation. For viral word-of-mouth, see contagious."). Clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk matches the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

valeriibeck-star/claude-skills

Path

skills/influence-psychology/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.