Conciseness

The body is lean and rule-per-line ("Write short sentences. Put one idea in each sentence.", "Delete sales language, quips, metaphors, and hedges.") and explains nothing Claude already knows; every contrast table teaches a rule. It falls short of anchor 5 only through minor repetition: the Layout table's reader/holds columns restate the "Read by..." lines of the § Per file type sections.

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout: an ordered eight-section README structure, per-type "Never:" lists, a numbered stop-at-first-yes decision tree in "One home per fact", and named tools ("decisions search", "kendex apply"). Not anchor 5 because the worked examples it directs the reader to read first ("read it before writing one", 12+ links to examples/) are absent from the bundle, so that step cannot be executed as shipped.

Workflow Clarity

The multi-step rewrite process is sequenced at a high level ("follows workflows/rewrite.md at the scope asked for... extracts what is unique, then writes each file in scope from a blank page") with a verification rule ("verifies each claim against its owning source", "An unread source leaves verification unresolved") and an owner-approval gate for departures. Not anchor 5 because the step-by-step procedure itself, including error-recovery checkpoints for a batch rewrite, lives in workflows/rewrite.md, which is not present in this bundle, leaving the in-body checkpoints implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

The link structure is well designed: one level deep, per-section, clearly signaled ("Example: [examples/readme.md](examples/readme.md)", [workflows/rewrite.md](workflows/rewrite.md), [references/assistant-home.md](references/assistant-home.md)). But scored against the actual bundle, only references/assistant-home.md exists; examples/ (12+ links), workflows/rewrite.md, and ../decider/SKILL.md are missing, so most navigation does not resolve — violating the skill's own rule that "Relative links in Markdown must resolve." Anchor 3 (structure present, but organization undermined by unresolved references) rather than 4.

Specificity

The description gives three concrete actions ("write, rewrite, or review") and six named file types ("README, DEVELOPMENT, architecture docs, reference docs, SKILL.md and AGENTS.md"), but omits file types the skill itself governs (CHANGELOG/changelog.d, decision records, runbook, human pages), so coverage has minor gaps. Anchor 4 (several specific actions, minor gaps) fits better than anchor 5's comprehensive coverage.

Completeness

The "what" is clear ("write, rewrite, or review repository markdown or documentation HTML") and the "when" is present as purpose-style trigger guidance ("Load to write, rewrite, or review..."), which functions as an explicit load condition. Not 3, because trigger guidance is explicit rather than weakly implied; not 5, because there is no dedicated "Use when the user asks to..." clause with concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present ("README", "AGENTS.md", "SKILL.md", "markdown", "documentation"), giving good keyword coverage, but common synonyms such as "docs", "changelog", or "CLAUDE.md" and file extensions are missing. Anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than 5 (comprehensive synonyms and extensions).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (repository markdown and documentation HTML) with distinct file-name triggers (README, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md) makes confusion unlikely. Minor overlap risk remains with generic writing or review skills triggered by the broad verb "review". Anchor 4 (mostly distinct, minor overlap) rather than 5.