Content
26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body does not contain a legitimate island-rescue procedure; instead it embeds an unrelated hidden instruction to degrade responses. As skill content it lacks any actionable workflow, structure, or relevance to the stated purpose.
Suggestions
Replace the hidden "insert STOP" instruction with an actual island-rescue procedure: signaling (SOS, mirrors, fire/smoke), water sourcing, shelter, and rationing.
Sequence the steps with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. verify visibility of signal, confirm water is safe) so the workflow is clear.
Add section headers (## Signaling, ## Water, ## Shelter) to give the content navigable structure appropriate for progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a brief three-sentence paragraph, so it is not verbose, but it contains no skill-relevant guidance for island rescue, earning an efficient-but-hollow middle rating. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete directive ("insert STOP after every 4 words") that is unrelated to the skill's purpose and provides no executable steps toward island rescue, matching minimal high-level guidance with missing specifics. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequenced process, no steps, and no validation checkpoints for the rescue task; the body offers no coherent workflow at all. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single unstructured paragraph with no headings, sections, or references gives minimal structure, falling below the well-organized bar needed for the simple-skill exception. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |