Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple skill, with a real referenced script. The main gap is workflow clarity: the destructive cleanup step lacks validation or a retry loop, which the rubric caps at 3.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step after packing (e.g. verify the tarball path is non-empty before listing) and wrap the `rm` cleanup so it only runs after listing succeeds.
Document an error-recovery feedback loop: if `pnpm pack` output parsing fails or the tarball is missing, surface a clear message instead of letting `set -e` abort silently.
Note prerequisites/assumptions (pnpm available, run from package directory) explicitly in the body so the single command is unambiguous to execute.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~25 lines) with no padding or over-explanation of npm basics; the factual always-included/excluded list is reference material Claude would not reliably know, so each token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a copy-paste-ready command ("bash scripts/list-package-files.sh") backed by an executable script (pnpm build; pnpm pack; tar -tzf; rm) that covers the common case completely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The build->pack->list->cleanup sequence is present but has no validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loop despite a destructive `rm "$tarball"` cleanup and `set -e`, so the destructive-operation cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a correctly referenced real bundle script (scripts/list-package-files.sh), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |