Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong, executable skill document: concrete commands, precise contracts, clear sequencing with abort-on-failure semantics, and a well-documented feedback loop. The only notable gap is the absence of any reference files despite referencing scripts/benchmark-e2e.ts, leaving all detail inlined in the single file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and information-dense (tables, typed contracts, commands), with only minor trimmable material — the intro paragraph restates the description and lines like "Wake up to reports showing exactly what improved and what still needs work" are motivational padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready ("bun run scripts/benchmark-e2e.ts --quick", the "while true" automation loop, the "rm -rf" cleanup), the flags table and typed interfaces (BenchmarkRunManifest, ReportJson) are concrete, and the self-improvement cycle gives exact steps including using "suggestedPatterns entries (copy-pasteable YAML)". | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four pipeline stages are clearly sequenced with an explicit "aborting on failure" checkpoint and a documented run → read gaps → apply fixes → re-run feedback loop, plus error/abort event examples; guidance for recovering from a failed stage mid-run (beyond aborting) is absent, keeping it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and navigation is easy, and validation is naturally built into the verify stage so the batch-operation cap does not apply. However, the ~140-line body is fully inline with no bundle files in the bundle (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and inlined content like the 9-row Prompt Table could live in a one-level-deep reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |