Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill: token-efficient, concrete, with best-practice progressive disclosure via a topic table and verified one-level-deep references. The main gaps are the absence of any complete worked example in the body and the lack of an explicitly sequenced end-to-end setup workflow, both of which are deferred to reference files.
Suggestions
Add one complete, copy-paste-ready example in the body — e.g., a full `vercel microfrontends create-group` invocation or a minimal `microfrontends.json` snippet — so the most common setup case is immediately executable without opening references.
Include a brief numbered setup sequence (create group → add child apps → configure routes and asset prefix → deploy → `pull` for local dev) with each step linked to its reference file, giving the multi-step process explicit ordering.
Move version-sensitive details such as "needs Vercel CLI 65+, older CLIs use --dpl" and the free-tier billing caveats into the relevant reference file's notes/deprecated section so the body stays evergreen and leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and efficient — a one-line concept gloss, compact CLI digest, and a lean reference table — but it inlines time-sensitive details ("needs Vercel CLI 65+, older CLIs use --dpl") and billing edge cases that the rubric says should live in a deprecated/notes section or reference file. Not anchor 5 because these clauses could be trimmed or relocated; well above anchor 3 since nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete subcommands with full flag lists (e.g., "create-group ... options: --name, --project (repeatable), --default-app, --default-route") give mostly executable guidance, but the body contains no complete copy-paste example — no full CLI invocation and no sample microfrontends.json snippet — leaving minor gaps that keep it below the fully-executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The retrieval workflow is explicit and unambiguous ("Do not read all references upfront ... search or grep the relevant file"), and destructive operations like delete-group document irreversibility and the CLI's confirmation prompts, so validation is not missing. It stays at 4 rather than 5 because no end-to-end setup sequence (create group → add projects → configure routing → deploy) is presented in the body; it stays above 3 because the destructive-op safeguards are explicitly documented rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exemplary progressive disclosure: a clear overview with a topic-to-file table mapping six topics to six real reference files (all verified to exist, contain substantive content, and reference no further files — exactly one level deep), plus an explicit instruction to grep rather than load everything upfront. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |