Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly copy-paste-ready release workflow with explicit gates, feedback loops, and a verification checklist. The only soft spot is the version-bump step, which states the intent but omits an exact editing command.
Suggestions
For step 3, add an exact command for bumping the version (e.g. a jq/sed one-liner against .plugin/plugin.json) so the bump is fully executable rather than an instruction.
Consider noting what to do when `git push` is rejected (e.g. remote ahead) to round out the error-recovery guidance for the push step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence — no explanation of git/bun/semver concepts — where nearly every line is an actionable command or a non-obvious clarification (e.g. 'no package.json version to sync'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable with concrete commands (typecheck, test, validate, build, git add/commit/push), but step 3 ('Update the version field in .plugin/plugin.json') gives an instruction rather than an exact command, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation ('Stop if any gate fails'), feedback loops (pre-commit hook failure → create a new commit, never amend), and a copy-in checklist for this destructive/batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with no bundle files and nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file; well-organized into clearly headed sections that make navigation trivial. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |