CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

code-review

从固定点(commit、branch、tag 或 merge-base)开始,按 Standards(代码是否符合本仓库记录的编码标准?)和 Spec(代码是否符合来源 issue/spec 的要求?)两个轴线审查变更。两个审查会在并行子代理中运行,并并排报告。适用于用户想审查 branch、PR、进行中的变更,或要求 “review since X” 时。

78

Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly-written, fully actionable skill body with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and well-structured single-file organization. Every section earns its place and the dual-axis workflow is unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: concrete git commands, one-line 'what -> fix' smell pairs, and sub-agent briefs with explicit 'Under 400 words' caps, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready git commands (diff/log/rev-parse), a concrete spec-source lookup order, and fully-specified sub-agent prompt briefs, covering the common cases executable as written.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 5-step sequence includes an explicit validation checkpoint (resolve fixed point + non-empty diff, fail early before spawning sub-agents) with rationale, plus aggregation rules and a no-cross-axis-reranking constraint.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained, well-organized SKILL.md with clear section structure; the only external pointer (docs/agents/issue-tracker.md) is clearly signaled and one level deep, and no bundle files are needed.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger phrasings and a distinctive dual-axis niche. Voice is correctly third person throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain and several concrete sub-capabilities (pin a fixed point, run two review axes in parallel sub-agents, aggregate side-by-side) rather than vague actions, though the 'actions' are framed as axes/process steps rather than a comprehensive enumerated list.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what (dual-axis Standards/Spec review of a fixed-point-to-HEAD diff) and when (an explicit '适用于...时' trigger clause with concrete triggers), matching the anchor for clearly answering both.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The '适用于用户想审查 branch、PR、进行中的变更,或要求 review since X 时' clause covers natural user phrasings including the distinctive 'review since X' idiom, synonyms, and concrete artifacts.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The dual-axis Standards/Spec framing plus fixed-point diff and 'review since X' trigger carve a clear niche unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, with minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.