Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The SKILL.md body itself is well-crafted: a lean, internally consistent glossary of deliberately nonstandard vocabulary, concrete design heuristics, and small contrast code examples, all organized into scannable sections. Its one serious defect is that both "进一步深化" references point to files missing from the bundle, leaving the skill's escalation paths dead and the progressive-disclosure structure non-functional.
Suggestions
Add the missing DEEPENING.md and DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md to the bundle (e.g., under references/), or remove the "进一步深化" section and inline a brief summary of that guidance — both links currently point to files that do not exist.
If the reference files are added, update the link targets to match their actual bundle location (e.g., references/DEEPENING.md) so the paths and the file structure agree.
Trim the "## 关系" section, which restates relationships already implicit in the glossary definitions, to reduce body redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The glossary defines only terms carrying project-specific, nonstandard meanings ("Depth - interface 上的 leverage", "Seam……_Avoid_: boundary") with explicit avoid-lists, and never re-explains basics Claude already knows. Minor trimmable redundancy: the "## 关系" section largely restates relationships implicit in the glossary definitions — fits anchor 4's "efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, immediately applicable heuristics: the "Deletion test" (想象删除这个 module……), three explicit interface-design questions (我能减少 methods 数量吗……), and three numbered testability rules with contrast TypeScript snippets (processOrder(order, paymentGateway) vs. internal new StripeGateway()). Per the instruction-only scoring note, absent full executables is not penalized, but the snippets are illustrative fragments rather than the complete copy-paste examples of anchor 5 — fits anchor 4's "mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a vocabulary/principles skill rather than a sequential procedure, and its application rule is unambiguous ("凡是在设计或重构代码时，都使用这套语言和原则" with explicit avoid-lists and design questions). Non-destructive, so no validation-cap applies; it sits above anchor 3's implicit checkpoints but lacks any sequenced design-session flow, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The "进一步深化" section clearly signals two one-level-deep references with descriptions of their content, but neither DEEPENING.md nor DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md exists in the bundle — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directory is present, so the delegated material (dependency classification, seam discipline, the parallel sub-agent interface-design workflow) is inaccessible and every navigation pointer is broken. This matches anchor 2's broken/minimal effective organization despite a well-structured main body. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |