Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, lean instruction body: concrete steps, complete configuration snippets, a real referenced bundle script, and an explicit verification step. The only gap is the absence of failure-path guidance after the verification test.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and fully operational: every section (blocked list, copy target, chmod, settings JSON, verify test) earns its place with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact destination paths for both scopes, chmod +x, two complete copy-paste JSON hook configs, and a concrete verification command with the expected exit code 2 and stderr BLOCKED message. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation step ("应以 code 2 退出,并向 stderr 打印 BLOCKED message"), but it stops short of anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do if the test fails, or how to confirm the hook actually fires inside Claude Code). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a single, clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference to scripts/block-dangerous-git.sh, which exists in the bundle and behaves exactly as the body claims; script content is appropriately kept out of SKILL.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |