CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grill-me

一个用来打磨计划或设计的持续追问式访谈。

51

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/productivity/grill-me/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is maximally concise and appropriately minimal for a thin invocation skill, but it delegates all substance to '/grilling' without explaining what that session involves or how to run it. It works as a stub but lacks self-contained actionable guidance.

Suggestions

Add a brief concrete description of what a /grilling session consists of (e.g., the questioning loop, number of rounds, or output format) so the skill is self-contained.

If /grilling is a separate referenced command, point to where its full behavior is documented so the reference is clearly signaled.

Include a minimal example of the expected interaction or output to raise actionability beyond a single invocation hint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a single lean sentence with zero padding or over-explanation, assuming Claude's competence; every token earns its place per the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

'运行一次 `/grilling` session' is a high-level invocation hint that delegates everything to another command; it gives minimal concrete guidance and no specifics on how to conduct the session.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-task skill the single action is largely unambiguous, but the body provides no detail on what the /grilling session entails, leaving a minor clarity gap below the top anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is appropriately minimal at under 50 lines with no external references needed, but it offers no organizational sections or signals, sitting just below the well-organized top anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear purpose in a single concise sentence but omits any 'Use when...' trigger guidance and relies on generic descriptors rather than natural user phrasing. It is competent but incomplete for trigger-based discovery.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete trigger phrases users would say, e.g. refining a plan, stress-testing a design, or probing assumptions.

Replace abstract terms like '打磨' and '追问式访谈' with more natural trigger keywords and synonyms a user might actually type.

Clarify distinctiveness by naming the specific artifact types (plan, design, proposal) it targets versus general review skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (打磨计划或设计) and one concrete action (持续追问式访谈), but coverage is not comprehensive, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states clearly what the skill does (持续追问式访谈 used to refine plans/designs) but provides no 'when' guidance; per the rubric a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like '打磨' and '追问式访谈' are domain descriptors rather than natural phrases a user would say when needing this skill; no 'Use when...' trigger guidance or common synonyms are present.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The plan/design refinement niche is somewhat specific and distinguishable, but the lack of distinct trigger phrases means it could still overlap with general planning or review skills.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.