Content
52%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally concise but overspecified as a delegator: it lacks any sequencing of the grilling and domain-modeling steps and omits validation/output guidance for a multi-step document-creation workflow.
Suggestions
Add a short sequenced workflow (e.g., 1. run the /grilling session, 2. capture decisions, 3. use /domain-modeling to emit ADRs and glossary entries).
State the expected outputs (ADR records and glossary entries) so it is clear when the skill is complete.
Include a validation/check step confirming the produced ADRs and glossary actually reflect the refined plan before finishing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single lean line with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete, invokable skills ('/grilling', '/domain-modeling'), but gives no detail on how they combine, what to produce, or in what order, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The task is conceptually multi-step (interview then document creation) yet the body provides no sequenced steps and no validation checkpoints, only 'run ... and use ...'. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the pointers to other skills are clearly signaled via slash commands, but the body has no organizational structure of its own to warrant a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |