Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured instruction skill with a genuine feedback loop and an unusually sharp definition of done. Its main weakness is that the deliverable itself is underspecified — no example spec, question, or brief format — leaving the agent to guess what 'done' output looks like.
Suggestions
Add a minimal example workflow spec (5-10 lines showing trigger, checkpoint, brief) so the agent knows the concrete shape of the deliverable it is eliciting.
Include one sample interview exchange (question + recommended answer) to make the '每个问题都附推荐答案' directive unambiguous.
Promote the 'if NOTES.md is empty, interview the user's world first' rule into the main flow so the entry-point sequence is explicit rather than buried in the workspace section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense: it spends zero tokens on concepts Claude already knows, and every section (loop lens, vocabulary, definition of done, workspace) contributes novel framing or directives the model could not infer, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Process guidance is concrete — "调用 Skill 工具并指定 `grilling`", "一次一个问题、每个问题都附推荐答案" — but key output details are missing: there is no example of what a workflow spec looks like, its file format, or a sample question/brief, leaving the agent to improvise the deliverable. This matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' rather than the mostly-executable anchor above. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is coherent (run grilling → interview around vocabulary/goal → create/edit/delete specs → done when an implementer needs no questions) and includes an explicit feedback loop ("持续 grilling 到那时；只要还有问题，就不算完成") plus a crisp definition of done. It falls short of 5 because the sequence is implicit rather than laid out, and the initial step ordering (when NOTES.md is thin, interview the user's world first) is buried in the workspace section. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ do not exist), and needs none — all content fits in four well-organized sections with clear headers, which per the rubric's simple-skill guideline earns a 5; the paths it does mention (workflows/*.md, NOTES.md) are real workspace targets, not dangling references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |