Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured template skill: the copy-paste PR body template plus per-section guidance leaves no ambiguity about the output, and it does not waste tokens explaining known concepts. Its weaknesses are structural: all eight example formats are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a reference file, and it points to a GLOSSARY.md that is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Move the visualization example catalog (pseudocode/call tree/component tree/file tree/Mermaid/diff examples) to a reference file such as references/visualizations.md, keeping the template and one-line selection guidance in SKILL.md.
Remove the "使用 GLOSSARY.md 中用户所在领域的语言" instruction or actually bundle a GLOSSARY.md — as written it points to a file that does not exist in the skill.
Consolidate the four diff examples into fewer, since each demonstrates the same format with a different subject.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a PR, Mermaid, or a diff is, and guidance like "跳过所有开场白，保持文字简短" mirrors its own economy. However, the catalog of eight visualization examples (including four full diff variants and a full code-block example) has minor trim opportunities, so it sits at 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than anchor 5's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The PR body template is copy-paste ready with exact section headers (## Summary, ## Evidence, ## Merge Danger) and defined placeholders, and the worked examples (pseudocode, call tree, component tree, file tree, Mermaid, diff, full code) cover the common output cases. For an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable with no gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill (write the PR body per the template) and the single action is unambiguous: the template fixes the output sequence (Summary → Evidence → Merge Danger) and each section's guidance states exactly what to fill in, including evidence tiers ("截图是 S-tier", "执行结果是 A-tier"). No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers are clear, but the ~140-line visualization example catalog is content that could live in a separate reference file while SKILL.md keeps the template and selection guidance, matching anchor 3's 'content that should be separate is inline'. Additionally, the body's sole external reference — "使用 GLOSSARY.md 中用户所在领域的语言" — is dangling: no GLOSSARY.md exists anywhere in the skill bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |