Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-sequenced workflow with explicit per-step completion criteria and a strong validate-fail-revert feedback loop. It loses only slightly on actionability and progressive disclosure because the rule definitions and config are described rather than fully shown inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence, defines only the domain vocabulary it needs, and every section earns its place without re-explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable with concrete commands and a real config file referenced, but the four rules are described rather than shown verbatim and layering is left as a commented stub. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear seven-step sequence each with an explicit 'Done when' checkpoint, and step 6 provides a full validate-pass/fail/revert feedback loop proving the rules bite. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level reference (dependency-cruiser.config.cjs); minor gaps since the config itself is the only bundle file and most rule detail is inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |