Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-organized, instruction-only skill with genuinely actionable guidance on lesson design, asset reuse, and workspace state, held back by a missing operational backbone. The three referenced format files do not exist in the bundle, and the teaching process is presented conceptually rather than as a sequenced workflow, so a first-time invocation requires synthesis and will hit broken references.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced format files (MISSION-FORMAT.md, RESOURCES-FORMAT.md, LEARNING-RECORD-FORMAT.md) in the bundle, or inline their formats so the '使用 ... 中的格式' instructions are followable.
Add an explicit session workflow (e.g., 1. Read MISSION.md and learning-records → 2. Confirm mission if empty → 3. Gather resources → 4. Build lesson from ./assets/ → 5. Record learning) with checkpoints.
Trim the Fluency/Storage-strength definitions and the retrieval-practice/spacing/interleaving glosses to a single line each, trusting Claude's knowledge of these concepts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive ("复用是默认，而不是例外", "每个答案都应有完全相同的词数"), with only minor over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, such as defining "Fluency strength"/"Storage strength" and glossing retrieval practice, spacing, and interleaving. It is not 5 because the Philosophy section's learning-science definitions could be tightened to one line each. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: file naming ("0001-<dash-case-name>.md", 递增), asset reuse rules ("在编写一个 lesson 之前，先读取 `./assets/`"), quiz design constraints, and mission-change confirmation. It is not 5 because the referenced format files (MISSION-FORMAT.md, RESOURCES-FORMAT.md, LEARNING-RECORD-FORMAT.md) are absent from the bundle and no lesson example or template is provided, leaving gaps in executable detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing cues are scattered but present ("你的第一项工作应是询问用户为什么想学这个", "在 RESOURCES.md 还没有充分填充前，你的重点应是...") and the mission/ZPD sections imply an order, yet the body is organized by concept rather than as an ordered workflow with checkpoints. It is not 4 because there is no explicit end-to-end sequence for a session (read mission → check learning records → find resources → build lesson) and validation/checkpoints remain implicit; it is above 2 because the rough sequence is recoverable. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and references are clearly signaled one level deep, but all three referenced format files (MISSION-FORMAT.md, RESOURCES-FORMAT.md, LEARNING-RECORD-FORMAT.md) are missing from the skill bundle, so instructions like "使用 MISSION-FORMAT.md 中的格式" cannot be followed. It is not 4 because dangling references are a real navigation failure; it is not 2 because the in-body structure itself is good and nothing that belongs in separate files is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |