Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-sequenced, instruction-only process with concrete templates and a user-approval checkpoint gating the batch publish, scoring consistently strong across all dimensions with only minor gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what tickets or trackers are — with only the dense wide-refactor/expand-contract paragraph reading as slightly more explanation than strictly necessary. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths ('.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md'), a numbering scheme, the 'ready-for-agent' label, and copy-paste-ready templates give mostly executable guidance, with the actual tracker API mechanics for GitHub/Linear left somewhat abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit feedback loop (quiz the user, 'iterate until user approves' before the batch publish) and a guardrail ('do not close or modify any parent issue'); the only gap is the absence of a post-publish verification step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into a Process section with numbered subsections and tagged template/rule blocks; as a self-contained process skill over 50 lines it has good structure, though it relies on no external reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |