Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted instruction-only skill: concrete paths, templates, and a numbered process with a user-approval checkpoint before batch publishing, all written densely without explaining things Claude already knows. Remaining gaps are a post-publish verification step, a worked example of a split, and a run-on paragraph on wide-refactor ordering that would benefit from restructuring.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and decision-dense — it assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of what a tracker or ticket is) and every section carries guidance. Minor instances could be trimmed: the quote 'Make the change easy, then make the easy change' and the run-on expand–contract paragraph (line 40), which packs three ordering strategies into one wall of text and would be tighter as a short list. Not a 5 because of these minor tightenings; clearly above the 'mostly efficient' anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact output paths ('.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md'), numbering rules ('按 dependency order…从 01 编号'), a named label ('ready-for-agent'), and two complete copy-paste templates. It falls short of anchor 5 only in lacking a worked example of a split ticket set and leaving steps like '按 blast radius 分批迁移' to judgment without a concrete batching illustration. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step process with an explicit feedback loop: '把建议的拆分作为 numbered list 展示…迭代到用户批准拆分' gates publishing on user approval, and '不要 close 或 modify 任何 parent issue' is a safety guardrail for the batch publish. Minor validation gap keeps it at 4 rather than 5: there is no post-publish verification (e.g. confirming native blocking links were actually created or files written correctly). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so everything lives in SKILL.md; the ~105-line body is well-sectioned with headers and XML-style delimiters around the vertical-slice rules and templates, and no content clearly belongs in a separate file. Scored against the actual (empty) bundle structure it is well above anchor 3 but short of the simple-skill exception (over 50 lines), and the two inline templates are the only candidates for extraction — 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |