Conciseness

Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence — it delegates UX to template.sh rather than re-explaining it — but a few explanatory sentences could still be trimmed.

Actionability

Names concrete library helpers (stage, ask_secret, write_env, set_secret, confirm) and exact commands (bash -n, shellcheck, chmod +x), plus specific files to read; the main gap is that the referenced template.sh is not present in the bundle to copy from.

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-stage sequence (Scope → Map → Author → Verify) with 'Done when' checkpoints and explicit validation (bash -n, shellcheck, static-trace of each value), though it is a verify-by-tracing loop rather than a strict validate→fix→retry cycle.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-structured into clear sections and it signals a one-level-deep reference to template.sh, but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle, so the navigation target is effectively missing.

Specificity

Names a concrete artifact ('交互式 bash wizard') and lists multiple specific scenarios — provisioning infrastructure, setting credentials/CI secrets, walking through third-party dashboards, one-time migrations and cutovers — giving comprehensive coverage of its niche.

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does ('生成一个交互式 bash wizard，逐步引导人完成...手动流程') and when to use it ('用于 provisioning...'), plus an explicit negative-trigger clause ('对于 agent 自己就能执行的步骤，不要调用它') answering both what and when concretely.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases a user would say ('provisioning 基础设施', '设置 credentials', 'CI secrets', '一次性 migration', 'cutover'), though a few common synonyms or phrasings are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche — human-only manual procedures via a bash wizard — and the explicit boundary against agent-executable steps minimizes conflict with adjacent skills.