Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, highly actionable instruction-only skill: an explicit staged workflow with concrete thresholds, real API commands, validation checkpoints, and honest reporting rules. The main weaknesses are minor — a few motivational passages that could be trimmed, and a bundled asset (assets/enquiry-form.html) that is not referenced from the body.
Suggestions
Trim the rationale passages that do not change behavior — e.g., the "Most first sites fail in the same places..." failure list in the intro and the "A business site gets shared on cards, menus, QR codes..." opener in section 6 — leaving only the directives they justify.
Point the enquiry-form example at the bundled file (e.g., "A complete optional example is at assets/enquiry-form.html") instead of, or alongside, the external URL, so the provided asset is discoverable from SKILL.md.
Consider moving the long section 6 domain-check API details into a reference file if the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as the overview with a one-level-deep pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows ("Tap targets at least 44 px", "contrast at least 4.5:1 for text", "Serve sized, compressed images (WebP or AVIF...)"). A few motivational passages could be trimmed, such as "Most first sites fail in the same places: a pretty page with no working way to order or book..." and "A business site gets shared on cards, menus, QR codes, Google Maps and Instagram bios, so the address matters on day one", so it fits the efficient-with-minor-trims anchor rather than the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: concrete thresholds ("Design at 360-400 px wide", "Tap targets at least 44 px", "og:image (1200x630)"), copy-paste-ready commands ("GET https://www.adddomain.net/api/check?name=<label>&src=github"), an explicit gap-marker convention ("[form endpoint]"), and per-business-type fallback rules ("Without shared availability, offer a booking request, not a confirmed reservation"). The common cases are each covered with specific, executable rules. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly numbered stages run from brief to handover, with explicit validation checkpoints ("Check and report each separately, honestly", "Check the address and HTTPS before saying it works. A record seen in DNS is not yet a live site") and an error-recovery feedback loop ("If a response is invalid, mark the check incomplete and let the owner verify it at their registrar"). This matches the top anchor: clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops, and a final checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into clearly headed sections that each earn their place, and the skill states it "remains usable without that example". However, the bundled example file assets/enquiry-form.html is never referenced by path — the body instead cites an external URL ("https://www.adddomain.net/guide/static-website-enquiry-form"), leaving the provided bundle asset undiscoverable. That is a minor organization gap (4), not a structural failure (3). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |