Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction skill with explicit validation checkpoints in its workflow and concrete make commands. The main gap is actionability of the workflow steps themselves, which are prose instructions rather than literal per-step executable commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Trigger, Surfaces, Stop Conditions, Workflow, Gotchas, Standard Commands, Acceptance) earns its place with no time-sensitive clutter. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ('make agent-validate', 'make agent-ci-gate CHANGED_FILES="..."', 'make agent-report ENV=cpu CHANGED_FILES="..."') and named files, but workflow steps are phrased as instructional prose rather than literal per-step commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('make agent-validate' as the focused iteration check, 'make agent-ci-gate' as the final gate) and a feedback/debt-recording step, appropriate for a harness change that affects batch enforcement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections with a one-level-deep 'Must Read' reference list pointing to real relative paths (tools/agent/docs/README.md, governance.md, plans/README.md) and no nested references; no bundle files exist to split further, so structure is good but not the full multi-file split of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |